• RSS Feed
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Ratings
Money and Markets
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Jack Crooks
    • John Ross Crooks, III
    • Tom Essaye
    • Mike Larson
    • Nilus Mattive
    • Ron Rowland
    • Guest Contributors ►
      • Monty Agarwal
      • Sean Brodrick
      • Amber Dakar
      • Larry Edelson
      • Don Lucek
      • Rudy Martin
      • Tony Sagami
      • Peter Schiff
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
    • Martin D. Weiss’ Blog
    • Jack Crooks’ Blog
    • Mike Larson’s Blog
    • Nilus Mattive’s Blog
  • Resources
    • Personal Finance Corner ►
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services  ►
      • Weiss Inner Circle
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
      • The Weiss Elite
    • Trading Services ►
      • Global Forex Alert
      • International ETF Trader
      • LEAPS Options Alert
      • Million-Dollar Contrarian Portfolio
      • Safe Money’s Crisis Trader
      • Weiss Million-Dollar Ratings Portfolio
      • World Currency Trader
    • Investment Newsletters ►
      • Income Superstars
      • Safe Money
    • Books ►
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media and Events
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive ►
      • 2011 Media Archive
      • 2010 Media Archive
      • 2009 Media Archive
      • 2008 Media Archive
      • 2007 Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Archives
    • 2010 Archives
    • 2009 Archives
    • 2008 Archives
    • 2007 Archives
    • 2006 Archives
    • 2005 Archives
    • 2004 Archives
    • 2003 Archives
    • Special Reports
  • Videos
  • Store
  • Contact Us
    • Interview a Money and Markets Analyst
    • Reader’s Comments – Testimonials

Issues

Share Email Print

“Mommy, Where Do ETFs Come From?”

Ron Rowland | Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 7:30 am

Ron Rowland

It’s the question every parent dreads: “Where do exchange traded funds come from?" If you haven’t heard it yet, you eventually will.

You can just tell the little ones “Ask Ron Rowland," and let me answer the question. Or, after reading today’s column, you might be ready to tackle the question yourself.

ETFs do not come out of thin air. Nor are they delivered by storks. Today I’ll let you in on the secret.

Before we reveal their origin, we must first define what ETFs are. They aren’t mutual funds, nor are they closed-end funds. They are something entirely different that did not exist in the U.S. until 1993.

Regardless of any setbacks the disaster might bring, Japan's companies will bounce back.
ETFs are not delivered
this way.

The first ETF was based on the S&P 500 and is still around today, under the symbol SPY. And you can read my 2009 column to learn why ETFs have become the hottest business on Wall Street.

The “secret sauce" that makes ETFs different from stocks, mutual funds, and closed-end funds is the creation and redemption mechanism. This is how new shares enter the world and eventually leave it.

Technical? Yes, but it makes a huge difference in your bottom line. So you need to understand it.

The first thing that happens is that a sponsoring firm — a company like iShares, SPDR, or PowerShares, to name some of the largest — files a registration form with the Securities & Exchange Commission in Washington. The SEC has jurisdiction over the stock markets.

Once the SEC grants registration, are we ready to trade? No, not yet. The ETF is now legitimate but has no public shares. They must be created.

This presents a problem. At this point the ETF is nothing but an empty shell. There are no stocks inside. So why would anyone buy it?

Enter the Authorized Participant (AP)

The AP is typically a financial institution that has a special agreement with the ETF sponsor. The AP assembles a portfolio of stocks that match whatever the sponsor says should be in the ETF. It then gives the portfolio — which may be worth millions of dollars — to the ETF trustee. In return, the AP receives shares of the ETF.

Notice that no cash changed hands in this “share creation" transaction. The AP traded shares of stock for shares of an ETF. The value of the underlying assets is the same. All that’s changed is the wrapper. This is important for tax reasons.

The AP takes the new ETF shares it just received and sells them to other investors via regular transactions on a stock exchange. At this point, these newly created ETF shares are freely traded on the open market.

The entire process works in reverse, too. If the AP has enough shares (typically 50,000) of an ETF, it can make a “redemption" and receive the actual stocks in exchange for the ETF shares.

This creation/redemption process keeps the ETF market price from getting too far above or below the ETF’s actual net asset value (NAV). The NAV is the total value of all the securities in its portfolio, less any liabilities, divided by the number of fund shares outstanding.

If the ETF’s price falls too far below the NAV, the AP will buy ETF shares and exchange them for the actual higher priced stocks. When the ETF is trading higher than its NAV, the opposite occurs. These are often called arbitrage transactions, and they are all part of what makes ETFs unique.

Now you might ask …

How Does Anyone Make Money
from All this Activity?

The same way you do when trading anything else: You sell it for more than you paid.

We can know how much an ETF share is worth by looking at its NAV, which is calculated every 15 seconds during the day. But why would anyone pay more than the NAV? That would be dumb, right?

Regardless of any setbacks the disaster might bring, Japan's companies will bounce back.
ETF net asset values are published every 15 seconds.

Not necessarily …

Small investors like ETFs because they offer a diversified portfolio in bite-size portions. For example, you probably can’t buy all 500 stocks of the S&P 500 unless you are very wealthy. But you can buy a few shares of the SPY ETF and get almost the same thing.

I say “almost" because most likely you will have to pay slightly more than the actual NAV when you buy shares of any ETF. You’ll also receive a little less than the NAV when you sell your shares. That’s how the market makers earn their living.

The difference in the buying price and selling price at any given time is called the bid/ask spread and is usually related to how specialized the ETF is. Those covering narrow sectors or illiquid foreign markets have a wider spread. Because they have to compete with each other, though, the difference tends to be very small in ETFs. Add in the convenience factor and it is a good deal for everyone.

Advertisement

Now that you understand the process, why does it matter?

It matters because the creation/redemption mechanism is what makes an ETF liquid and cost-effective. Without it, ETFs would be very much like those old closed-end funds that routinely trade 10 percent above or below their NAV — and sometimes even more.

We got a real-world demonstration of this just in the last few weeks …

The Egyptian stock market closed on January 27 when violence broke out, and stayed closed until last week. And as I wrote on February 3, this meant big trouble for Market Vectors Egypt (EGPT).

Source: Bloomberg

With the underlying market inaccessible for so long, no one had any idea what EGPT shares were really worth. And, without the ability to buy and sell the underlying stocks, the creation/redemption process was not able to function properly.

The result was predictable: Dramatically higher price premiums.

At one point, shares of EGPT were trading at a 24 percent premium largely due to the fact that new shares could not be created. It was essentially trading as a closed-end fund. However, EGPT snapped right back in line when the Egyptian market reopened on March 23 after being closed for nearly two months.

Now you know where ETFs come from. Not so difficult, was it? Once you see how creation/redemption works, it actually seems quite simple.

Why didn’t anyone think of it sooner? I don’t know, but I’m glad they finally did. For small investors, ETFs are one of the best inventions ever!

Best wishes,

Ron

Ron Rowland is widely regarded as a leading ETF and mutual fund advisor. You may have read about Mr. Rowland and his strategies in publications such as The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Investor's Business Daily, Forbes.com, Barron's, Hulbert Financial Digest and many more. As a former mutual fund manager from 2000 to 2002, Ron was a pioneer in using ETFs inside of mutual funds. Today, he is the editor of International ETF Trader, dedicated to helping investors use ETFs to profit from ever-changing global market conditions.

Share Email
Tweet

{ 6 comments }

cliff Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 9:07 am

Ver;y interesting, but how then can an ETF such as CEF.A exhibit a persistent difference of around 8-10% between NAV and share value? Why isn’t the AP doing its job?

Adam Friday, April 1, 2011 at 8:16 am

Cliff–

CEF isn’t an ETF. It’s a close-ended fund.

Clas Ekwall Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 12:15 pm

Excellent overview, Ron, and written in such a logical sequence that even I could understand how the whole thing functions. Bravo!

Phil Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 4:47 pm

Ron,
My biggest complaint regarding ETF’s and ETN’s are the tax system. How can an investor know what he will pay in taxes on these things?

steve Friday, April 1, 2011 at 12:03 am

ron,

if you answered these question would you please post them. they are valid and interesting. thx.

Lenny Herman Monday, April 4, 2011 at 8:56 am

Thanks for the information. I’ve been living under a rock for the last 25 years. Depending on Mutual funds that were going nowhere, except for the money I keep investing it them through my 401K’s

Previous post: Why the Case for a Big Bear Just Got Stronger!

Next post: ‘Shadow inventory’ of 1.8 million homes could prolong housing slump

  • Sign Up FREE

    To receive your Money and Markets FREE investment newsletter subscription, type in your e-mail address. We respect your privacy

  • Advertising

  • Take advantage of our strong track record for safety to guard your wealth in these trying times with our free daily updates delivered to your inbox every morning.
  • Advertising

  • Market Update

    Click an index for a graph of its recent activity:

    U.S.

    Wed 5/23/12, 5:30pm
    Index Last Change
    DOW
    NASDAQ 2,850 +11.0
    NASDAQ
    S&P 500 1,319 +2.2
    S&P 500

    Europe

    Wed 5/23/12, 11:57am
    Index Last Change
    FTSE 100 5,266 -136.9
    FTSE 100
    CAC 40 3,003 -80.8
    CAC 40
    DAX 6,286 -149.8
    DAX

    Asia

    Thu 5/24/12, 10:43pm
    Index Last Change
    HANG SENG 18,698 -88.3
    HANG SENG
    NIKKEI 225 8,532 -24.6
    NIKKEI 225
    CSI 300 2,619 +1.8
    CSI 300
  • Advertising

  • Weiss Group Press Releases

    Weiss Ratings: U.S. Credit Union Deposits Up $41 Billion in 2011 April 2, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: U.S. Banking Industry Continues Modest Turnaround March 26, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: Southwestern Banks Show Signs of Turnaround January 24, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: Sluggish Demand Triggers Downgrades of China, Canada, Saudi Arabia December 19, 2011
    Weiss Ratings: Eurozone Crisis Prompts Debt Downgrades December 9, 2011
    • Find us on Facebook

    • Follow us on Twitter

      • Money and Markets on Twitter
      • Money and Markets on Twitter
      • Dr Martin D. Weiss on Twitter
      • Nilus Mattive on Twitter
      • Ron Rowland on Twitter
      • Mike Larson on Twitter
      • Jack Crooks on Twitter
    • Weiss Ratings - Top-Rated Banks, Credit-Unions, Insurers

    • Weiss Research Affiliate

    • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Legal
    • Privacy
    • Whitelist
    • Advertising
    • ©2012 Money and Markets. All Rights Reserved.
    Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]