• RSS Feed
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Ratings
Money and Markets
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Jack Crooks
    • John Ross Crooks, III
    • Tom Essaye
    • Mike Larson
    • Nilus Mattive
    • Ron Rowland
    • Guest Contributors ►
      • Monty Agarwal
      • Sean Brodrick
      • Amber Dakar
      • Larry Edelson
      • Don Lucek
      • Rudy Martin
      • Tony Sagami
      • Peter Schiff
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
    • Martin D. Weiss’ Blog
    • Jack Crooks’ Blog
    • Mike Larson’s Blog
    • Nilus Mattive’s Blog
  • Resources
    • Personal Finance Corner ►
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services  ►
      • Weiss Inner Circle
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
      • The Weiss Elite
    • Trading Services ►
      • Global Forex Alert
      • International ETF Trader
      • LEAPS Options Alert
      • Million-Dollar Contrarian Portfolio
      • Safe Money’s Crisis Trader
      • Weiss Million-Dollar Ratings Portfolio
      • World Currency Trader
    • Investment Newsletters ►
      • Income Superstars
      • Safe Money
    • Books ►
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media and Events
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive ►
      • 2011 Media Archive
      • 2010 Media Archive
      • 2009 Media Archive
      • 2008 Media Archive
      • 2007 Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Archives
    • 2010 Archives
    • 2009 Archives
    • 2008 Archives
    • 2007 Archives
    • 2006 Archives
    • 2005 Archives
    • 2004 Archives
    • 2003 Archives
    • Special Reports
  • Videos
  • Store
  • Contact Us
    • Interview a Money and Markets Analyst
    • Reader’s Comments – Testimonials

Issues

Share Email Print

Does Your ETF Own Derivatives?

Ron Rowland | Thursday, December 2, 2010 at 7:30 am

Ron Rowland

What’s in your exchange traded fund (ETF)? The obvious answer is “stocks” if it is a stock ETF, and “bonds” if it is a bond ETF. That’s not always the case, though.

Some ETFs use derivative instruments like futures, options, and swaps. So is there any reason to worry?

Today we’ll explore those questions. I think you may be surprised with the answers.

“Derivative” Isn’t Always a Dirty Word

First, let’s talk about the d-word. A derivative is nothing more than a security that derives its value from something else. When you buy shares of a common stock — we’ll use Microsoft (MSFT) as our example — you are actually getting a piece of ownership in the company.

However, if you buy a call option on Microsoft stock, you aren’t an owner of Microsoft. What you own is the right to become an owner of Microsoft stock at a certain price before a specified deadline. You decide whether to exercise that right.

When you buy a stock, you own a piece of the company.
When you buy a stock, you own a piece of the company.

This may seem like a fine distinction, but legally it’s huge! Microsoft shareholders have many rights. You get to vote on important matters, you get invited to the annual meeting, and you might get a dividend. Option holders receive none of these.

A call option on Microsoft does have some value, though. Its worth is derived from the value of the underlying MSFT shares. Derivatives can reflect the value of a single stock, a bond, an index, a commodity, or even an ETF. Some of these instruments get pretty exotic and are intended mainly for large, institutional investors.

Options, futures, and other derivative instruments can be helpful tools — but like all tools, they can be dangerous if used incorrectly.

Are There Derivatives in Your ETF?

Professional mutual fund managers have been using derivatives for years. Often they will buy or sell index futures to adjust their market exposure quickly. The futures position is then unwound as actual stocks are bought or sold. In most cases, this practice is very routine and carries minimal added risk.

ETFs are usually designed to track an index, like the S&P 500. The easiest way to track an index is to buy the stocks in the index. In the case of the S&P 500, that means you need to own 500 different stocks in various proportions. If you only own 400 of the 500, your results on any given day could vary from the index. And the variance could be quite a lot, depending which stocks are missing from your portfolio.

ETF sponsors know they need to follow their benchmark indexes very closely — but they also need to offer something unique and innovative to attract assets.

You’ve probably heard of inverse ETFs, which are designed to go up as an index goes down. These ETFs can achieve their objective in one of two ways:

  • Borrowing shares of stock to sell short, or
  • Owning derivatives like swaps and futures.

Most of the time, it’s more economical and convenient for the ETF to buy derivatives. Even ProShares Short S&P 500 (SH), one of the most plain-vanilla inverse ETFs, gets its exposure from derivatives instead of actually shorting the 500 stocks in the S&P.

Inverse and leveraged ETFs rely on derivatives.
Inverse and leveraged ETFs rely on derivatives.

Some other ETF categories make heavy use of derivatives as well. Leveraged ETFs are a good example …

Doubling or tripling the daily return of an index may be nice — but making it happen is more complicated than you might think. Leveraged ETFs typically deliver their enhanced results by using swaps and/or futures and should be used with great caution.

Commodity-based ETFs, primarily those that follow precious metals, are backed by physical commodities in storage. SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) is the most popular example of a physically-backed ETF.

But since storage costs are much higher for energy and agricultural goods, ETFs in those segments almost always own futures contracts. PowerShares DB Commodity Index (DBC) is the most popular broad-based commodity ETF, and it invests in futures contracts.

Physically-backed commodity ETFs own real metal.
Physically-backed commodity ETFs own real metal.

Then there are the exchange traded notes (ETNs) …

I highlighted the risks of ETNs in a Money and Markets column almost two years ago. Not much has changed since then. When you buy an ETN, you aren’t even getting any derivatives — you are making a loan to the issuer. That means you only have a promise from the issuing bank to pay you some money someday.

My 6-Point ETF Derivatives Guidelines

Here is my quick 6-point reference to help you determine if an ETF invests primarily in the underlying securities or in derivatives. Keep in mind that these are guidelines. Go to the sponsor’s web site and look at the actual holdings to know for sure.

  1. ETFs tracking an index in a non-leveraged and non-inverse format typically own the underlying securities of the index, whether they are stocks, bonds, or both.
  2. Inverse ETFs typically have the majority of their assets in derivatives (swaps and futures).
  3. Leveraged ETFs typically have the majority of their assets in derivatives (swaps and futures).
  4. Physically-backed commodity funds own the commodity they are tracking (this group currently includes only precious metals funds as other commodities are too expensive to store).
  5. Commodity ETFs that are not physically-backed usually track a futures index and invest in those futures contracts.
  6. ETNs do not buy anything. They are bonds that track an equity, commodity, a bond, or other index, and are subject to the credit risk of the issuer. The issuer will often hedge his position with various derivatives.

The Bottom Line …

Am I saying you should avoid all ETFs that contain derivatives? No, not at all. I use them myself in certain circumstances. I’m just telling you to be cautious.

Actually, I am very impressed by the agility with which the ETF industry has met the demand for its products. The trading mechanisms and administrative infrastructure work very well.

I do have one suggestion for ETF sponsors, though …

Can you please find an easier way for the public to identify what a given ETF owns? Right now it requires a trip to each ETF’s web site and sometimes a careful reading of the prospectus. A central online database would be very helpful.

A recent question from a reader provided the inspiration for today’s column.

Mike asked:

“Since most ETFs own derivatives instead of stocks, are they subject to melting down or locking up? In particular, I’d like to know more about ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT).”

Mike, TBT is both leveraged and inverse, so based on the guidelines above, my initial assumption would be that it owns derivatives. A visit to its web site confirms this: About 93 percent of the fund is invested in swaps and only 7 percent is short actual Treasury bonds.

Regarding your concern about ETFs not functioning correctly, I don’t think you have anything to worry about in that respect. Yes, there have recently been a few articles and reports about ETFs possibly collapsing from short-selling and ETFs causing systemic risk.

However, I believe these are erroneous. They appear to be written by people who not truly understand how ETFs work, especially the creation/redemption process.

Best wishes,

Ron

P.S. This week on Money and Markets TV, we discuss a topic that’s on people’s minds this holiday season: Technology. Tech devices top many wish lists, and tech stocks are among the hottest buys in the market.

So tune in tonight, December 2, at 7 P.M. Eastern time (4:00 P.M. Pacific). Simply go to www.weissmoneynetwork.com and follow the on-screen instructions. Access is free and no registration is required.

Share Email
Tweet

{ 2 comments }

Jimi Thursday, December 2, 2010 at 11:19 am

Although you can’t give tax advice, can you in general discuss the tax implications of owning an ETF that uses futures contracts. What IRS tax form schedule would you record the investment?

Wayne Thursday, December 2, 2010 at 2:20 pm

Dear Mr. Rowland,
I appreciate your clarifying the differences in ETF holdings. I’ve been fuzzy on that.

Another question….who inspects and audits storehouses of actual commodity holdings of precious metal ETFs? I’m told there are only about 300 inspectors in the U.S. that verify the actual holdings of issuers. If not done regularly, wouldn’t it be possible to scam the public by issuing more shares than are in reserve?
Wayne

Previous post: The Solution to the Government Debt Problem Is Well Known

Next post: Deficit Commission Fiddles While Rome (and Dublin … and Athens … Lisbon) Burns!

  • Sign Up FREE

    To receive your Money and Markets FREE investment newsletter subscription, type in your e-mail address. We respect your privacy

  • Advertising

  • Take advantage of our strong track record for safety to guard your wealth in these trying times with our free daily updates delivered to your inbox every morning.
  • Advertising

  • Market Update

    Click an index for a graph of its recent activity:

    U.S.

    Wed 5/23/12, 5:30pm
    Index Last Change
    DOW
    NASDAQ 2,850 +0.0
    NASDAQ
    S&P 500 1,319 +2.2
    S&P 500

    Europe

    Thu 5/24/12, 7:29am
    Index Last Change
    FTSE 100 5,346 +79.3
    FTSE 100
    CAC 40 3,038 +35.2
    CAC 40
    DAX 6,333 +46.8
    DAX

    Asia

    Thu 5/24/12, 2:28am
    Index Last Change
    HANG SENG 18,666 -119.8
    HANG SENG
    NIKKEI 225 8,563 +6.8
    NIKKEI 225
    CSI 300 2,595 -21.6
    CSI 300
  • Advertising

  • Weiss Group Press Releases

    Weiss Ratings: U.S. Credit Union Deposits Up $41 Billion in 2011 April 2, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: U.S. Banking Industry Continues Modest Turnaround March 26, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: Southwestern Banks Show Signs of Turnaround January 24, 2012
    Weiss Ratings: Sluggish Demand Triggers Downgrades of China, Canada, Saudi Arabia December 19, 2011
    Weiss Ratings: Eurozone Crisis Prompts Debt Downgrades December 9, 2011
    • Find us on Facebook

    • Follow us on Twitter

      • Money and Markets on Twitter
      • Money and Markets on Twitter
      • Dr Martin D. Weiss on Twitter
      • Nilus Mattive on Twitter
      • Ron Rowland on Twitter
      • Mike Larson on Twitter
      • Jack Crooks on Twitter
    • Weiss Ratings - Top-Rated Banks, Credit-Unions, Insurers

    • Weiss Research Affiliate

    • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Legal
    • Privacy
    • Whitelist
    • Advertising
    • ©2012 Money and Markets. All Rights Reserved.
    Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]